Any match between two of London’s three leading clubs
will have some added spice heading into it, and the recent game between
Tottenham and Chelsea was no different.
However, this particular London derby failed to live up
to the pre-game hype. Tottenham swept Chelsea aside, winning 3-1. What’s more,
the final scoreline did not reflect how one-sided the game truly was. Such was Tottenham’s
superiority that they could easily have beaten a discombobulated, disjointed
Chelsea team by at least four goals.
But even more than that, this loss highlighted that Chelsea
are still a long way from challenging for titles, whether domestically or in Europe.
Although the appointment of Maurizio Sarri as head coach has somewhat improved the
current situation at Stamford Bridge, the reality is that Sarri’s arrival at
Chelsea has merely papered over the cracks at a team which is systemically and
fundamentally flawed.
The first aspect which must be discussed is what Chelsea
did during the previous off-season.
As has been the case in many of the last few transfer
windows, Chelsea once again failed to improve their squad and overpaid for
players. In terms of personnel, they are arguably even worse off than they were
before the transfer window began.
While Jorginho has played fairly well for the Blues thus
far, his transfer fee of ₤51.3 million was clearly an overpay on Chelsea’s part,
especially considering the fact that his vastly superior teammate in midfield N’Golo
Kanté was signed for ₤32 million.
Chelsea also inexplicably let Michy Batshuayi spend the
season on loan at Valencia. Considering the fact that Chelsea now have only two
strikers in their squad after Batshuayi’s departure, the move was a real
head-scratcher.
Of course, one of the two elephants in the room has to be
mentioned here: the departure of Thibaut Courtois.
Although Courtois had openly stated his intentions to
leave Chelsea, the club only received ₤31.5 million and a season-long loan for
Mateo Kovačić from Real Madrid. While Kovačić has had a good season thus far,
this is in no way an adequate return for the Belgian superstar.
It gets even worse, though.
Shortly before Courtois left Chelsea, his replacement had
already been signed: Kepa Arrizabalaga, whom Chelsea picked up from Athletic
Bilbao for the record-breaking price of ₤72 million.
At the time of his signing, Kepa had only played in a
major football league for two years, totalling 53 appearances for Bilbao. Kepa
had also only earned one cap for Spain to that point.
Kepa is a solid goalkeeper, but he is certainly not
deserving of the status of “world’s most expensive goalkeeper”. I can think of
at least 10 goalkeepers, of which Courtois is one, who would or should command
a higher transfer fee than the Basque shot-stopper.
The second elephant in the room is the transfer drama
surrounding Eden Hazard.
There has been much speculation linking Chelsea’s best
player with a move to Real Madrid. Although these transfer links have existed
for a while now, they only strengthened after the winger’s spectacular World
Cup campaign for Belgium, in which he helped them to third place and only
finished behind Luka Modrić in the tournament MVP rankings.
It appears that the uncertainty surrounding Hazard has
destabilized the locker room at Chelsea, as even though they started the season
well, Chelsea seem to have lost some of their edge since, as could be seen in
their loss to Spurs.
If Hazard leaves, his departure could prove to have a
domino effect, causing even more players to leave and Chelsea to lose even more
ground to rival teams.
Finally, with the exception of Kanté, this Chelsea team –
Hazard included to some extent – seems to lack heart and fighting spirit compared
to other leading teams.
Teams such as Liverpool, Manchester City, and Arsenal would
certainly not have folded the way Chelsea did after falling behind against
Spurs. This is a definite indictment on the team’s mentality – they just do not
seem to want it badly enough. The Spurs match was especially egregious because
it was a derby – the sort of match you would expect players to most desire a
victory in.
Although Chelsea shuffled the deck during the off-season,
it appears that they have only drawn a pair against their rivals’ full houses,
flushes, and straights.
No comments:
Post a Comment