It is always a major occasion in the world of football
when the first- and second-placed teams in a major league play against each
other. This past weekend, Barcelona and Atlético Madrid did just that, with
Barcelona coming out on top courtesy of a Lionel Messi free kick.
However, this may not have been the case if two Barcelona
players had received the punishment they deserved to get instead of what they
actually got.
Two matches before the Barça-Atlético clash, Barcelona
played against Girona, and heading into the match against Girona, Luis Suárez
and Jordi Alba were both one yellow card away from receiving a one-match
suspension.
However, both tried to get themselves booked so that they
would miss the subsequent match against Las Palmas, thus ensuring that they
would be able to play against Atlético. Alba was booked and thus suspended;
Suárez was not.
While it is true that neither Suárez nor Alba were at
their best against Atlético, had they been suspended for the Atlético match
instead of the Las Palmas one, Barça would’ve been missing two of their
starters, including their second-best player. That alone would have changed the
way both teams would have approached the game.
While the yellow-card accumulation rules exist for a
reason, this sort of exploitation of the rules calls for a minor change to the
rules.
My proposal is as follows: the league authorities should
be given the power to select which match the offending player will be suspended
for in cases in which the authorities consider the player to have gone out of
his way to receive a yellow card.
This does not apply to intentional fouls to stop a
possible goal, because that would not be considered “going out of one’s way”,
as the player who committed the foul would’ve done so anyway.
The rules on yellow cards and suspensions are not the
only football rules which I believe need modification.
At present, the denial of an obvious goal-scoring
opportunity (DOGSO) is a red-card offense, but it only results in a free kick
for the team who had the player fouled.
Thus, there are situations where it may be more
advantageous for the defending team to sacrifice a player to prevent a possible
goal.
If it is late in the game and the attacking team has a
clear run at goal, it is often the smart play for the defending team to have
someone bring the attacking player down before he reaches the penalty area.
This would prevent a possible goal or a penalty, and the
defending team only has to play a few more minutes with the numerical
disadvantage.
Clearly, when the rule on DOGSO was first formulated,
this was not what was had in mind.
The rule on DOGSO should be changed so that regardless of
where on the pitch the offense takes place, it will always result in a penalty
for the attacking team.
Similar to the rules on yellow cards, in no situation
should committing this offense cause the offender to benefit. Yet, that is what
can happen.
One other rule which I believe needs to be changed is
that on diving.
Diving should not be a bookable offense during a match.
I’m not saying that diving to try to earn a free kick or
penalty should not be punished. However, it’s the toughest call for a referee
to make, and often, a combination of the incident itself, the scoreline at the
time, and the reputation of the players involved contribute to the decision
made.
The key words are “during a match”.
To me, all decisions and punishment meted out for diving
should be retrospective.
After the official review of a match, should there be any
player that has found to have dived, he should receive a retrospective yellow
card. If the player was also booked once during the same match, he would then
receive the same punishments that apply to players who receive an ordinary red
card.
While football, like any other human endeavour, will be
subject to erroneous judgments made by people, as well as the possibility of
loopholes being exploited, the authorities should do all they can to minimise
these judgments and loopholes from damaging the game, thus making a football
match a better experience for players, fans, coaches, and even referees.
No comments:
Post a Comment