There
have been many cases in which a footballer is signed for a gaudy transfer fee
but subsequently never makes the desired impact at his new club.
Some
of the most notorious examples of this include the transfers of James Rodríguez
to Real Madrid, Zlatan Ibrahimović to Barcelona, Fernando Torres to Chelsea,
and Ángel Di María to Manchester United.
Now,
five years after the ill-advised signing of Di María, United again appear to
have severely overpaid to sign a player.
Manchester
United have just paid ₤50 million to sign Aaron Wan-Bissaka from Crystal
Palace.
It’s
not that I believe the Londoner will be a complete failure at Old Trafford.
There is definitely some degree of potential there, and he should be able to
crack the rotation and perhaps establish himself as a starter.
However,
the Red Devils have just paid an amount for which one expects a high-quality,
starting 11 player. Wan-Bissaka is still just 21 and has not yet shown any
signs that he might ascend to that level someday. He has only played 42 league
games for Palace and has never been capped by England. This is a player who
made his professional debut less than 18 months ago.
This
signing appears to be a “panic purchase” by United. After a disappointing
season in which United finished sixth in the Premier League, were knocked out
earlier than expected in both the FA Cup and Carabao Cup, and were soundly
defeated by Barcelona in the Champions League quarterfinals, United knew that
major upgrades were needed to set the club back on the path toward its former
glories.
This
makes their signing of Wan-Bissaka all the more puzzling. What United need
right now is a player who will be ready to contribute at a high level straight
from his first day at United. Wan-Bissaka does not fit that bill.
Just
looking at other full-backs, United could very well have signed one of Lukas
Klostermann, Alex Telles, José Gaya, Alex Sandro, or Nélson Semedo. Even if
United felt that they ought to sign a promising young prospect, they could
easily have gone with Achraf Hakimi. Although the 20-year-old Moroccan has only
played 57 career league games, he has already spent time at two major clubs:
Real Madrid and Borussia Dortmund. Thus, he already has some of the big-game
experience which Wan-Bissaka lacks.
If
the reason that United signed Wan-Bissaka was to build for the future, once
again, they could have made better signings for a similar or less expensive
fee. One of players 23 years old or younger such as Rúben Neves, Nicolò
Zaniolo, Hirving Lozano, Jonathan Tah, or Youri Tielemans could have been
signed. All of them have established themselves to a greater degree, and most
seem to have higher ceilings, than Wan-Bissaka has.
Many
of Europe’s leading clubs have already made notable signings. Barcelona have
signed Frenkie de Jong and Neto. Real Madrid have brought in Eden Hazard, Luka
Jović, and Ferland Mendy. Bayern Munich have added French full-backs Benjamin
Pavard and Lucas Hernandez to their roster. Juventus have signed Adrien Rabiot;
Borussia Dortmund, Mats Hummels.
This
is the level of player required to be signed by a club that is to return to or
remain among world football’s best. The fact that United committed so much
money to sign someone who has not shown anything of note thus far proves how
far the club has fallen and clearly displays their general lack of ambition.
There
is still plenty of time in this transfer window to turn things around, but
given United’s recent track record in this department, the signs do not appear
to be promising. Over the last three years, the only two truly impactful
signings made by United were those of Ibrahimović and Paul Pogba. Furthermore,
Ibrahimović left United after two seasons which included an ACL tear, while
Pogba was signed for what was then an all-time record fee.
If
United go on to strike out in this off-season’s transfer window or again
overpay for most or all of their signings, their fans can expect to endure
another difficult season in what has now proven to be their worst multi-year
stretch in almost 30 years.
Certainly,
Manchester is no longer red.